Even though Iceland is a very seismically active country they've only had a few large earthquakes in the past 50 years. They had a big (over M5.9) earthquake in 2008 where only 30 people were injured with no human fatalities reported (a number of sheep perished though). That earthquake registered in at M6.1 and caused some structural damage to the towns around the epicenter. In June 2000 they were also hit with two earthquakes (one recorded as a M6.6 and one at M6.5) a few days apart, but even then the damage was more to their road and older building infrastructure and again there were no casualties.
June 2000 earthquake |
You can check out Iceland's earthquake activity by visiting the Iceland Met page. It gives a really great summary of the last 48 hours of seismic activity for Iceland. It also gives you a really good summary of the activity per week. Just in the week of February 1-7th they measured 350 different earthquakes but none of them registered over M3.1 which seems to be the normal for Iceland. Because of it's location on the Mid Atlantic Ridge and it's proximity to two tectonic plate boundaries, Iceland is an area prone to volcanoes and earthquakes but big earthquakes are rare.
Activity 02/14-02/16/16 |
The largest earthquakes in Iceland occur within transform zones which connect the north east volcanic zones and eastern volcanic zones of the island with the active ocean ridge off shore (the Tjornes Fracture Zone (TFZ) and South Iceland Seismic Zone (SISZ)) and at the centre of the island at the junction between three volcanic zones. The SISZ is the most seismic active zone in Northern Europe.
As few injuries resulted from the June 2000 earthquakes, a blasé attitude may exist that earthquake vulnerability is low and that earthquakes are a bit of fun to experience once in a while. Iceland's attitude towards earthquakes appears (to me) to be pretty laid back. They do take some precautionary measures such as awareness and preparedness guidelines for earthquakes though, because they can cause landslides and rocks to fall and many homes are built at the base of steep mountains. Also, for Iceland, often times an earthquake is accompanied by volcanic activity. Iceland's warning systems and awareness campaigns focus mostly on volcanic activity (which we'll discuss in week five) and they don't put as much concern into risk assessment and preparedness for an earthquake. Their Civil Protection Department website does list preventative measures for a number of situations and they suggest the same Duck, Cover, Hold technique that we teach in the US.
As to structural reinforcement in Iceland, they already construct many of their buildings to withstand an earthquake. According to the OECD, after devastating earthquakes in 1896 and 1929, reinforced buildings became the usual standard for construction. "Engineers recognised the importance of reinforcing concrete with steel bars as well as the continuity built into concrete structures poured in situ." (OECD) After 1976 Iceland also used the California Uniform Building Code as a model for construction although now they are moving towards the Eurocode 8 for their seismic design. (OECD) Accordingly, this has lowered the chance of major structural damage from future earthquakes.
Works cited:
Keller, Edward and Duane DeVecchio. Natural Hazards. New Jersey: Prentice, 2012. Print.
OECD. Educational Facilities and Risk Management Natural Disasters: Natural Disasters. France: OECD Publication. 2004. Print.
link to ebook (I specifically used page 86 for information)
Images:
2000 earthquake image: uk/Tectonics%20and%20Seismicity%20in%20Iceland/Inrtoduction.html
Map of Iceland earthquake activity:
http://en.vedur.is/
Thanks for reading!!
Jennifer
Hello Jennifer!
ReplyDeleteWhat a great post with lots of interesting information. I find it fascinating Iceland wouldn't take earthquakes as seriously as their volcanic eruptions! Has there been measures to stop construction at the base of mountains a least?...due to their emphases on landslides of course. My country, England, also takes a very backseat approach to preventative measures but that's because they sit in the middle of the Eurasia plate and don't feel much seismic activity. I look forward to learning more about Iceland's geography soon. Take care!
Hi Kate!
ReplyDeleteI was surprised too when I started researching earthquakes in Iceland to find that, for the most part, the country seems pretty mellow when it comes to earthquake preparedness. Lots of information came up about volcanic eruptions but I had to search pretty hard to find information about disaster prevention for earthquakes. I think with over 30 volcanoes on the island that houses built at their base was inevitable. I didn't come across anything that suggest that they've stopped building at the base of the volcano/glaciers.
I've never heard about an big earthquake in England so I can see why they wouldn't put much into preventative measure for earthquakes:)
Yes, this country is well monitored and with a lot of resources as I was hoping. The population might not be that 'afraid' of quakes, they seem frequent and small enough so the energy gets released and not accumulated...but it is great they are monitoring them in such a good detail: one of the only ways we know a volcanic eruption is in the near future is the increase in tremors....and they have a lot of those......to be continued in two weeks (: Great and very complete post!-enjoying it very much....
ReplyDeleteHi Jennifer! I found your post very interesting! You did a wonderful job explaining all the information as well as great choice of photographs. I never knew Iceland was such a hot spot for earthquakes. It sounds like they maybe should be more carefully when choosing building locations though the earthquake structures seem to be a important building requirement, as they should. I had hoped to visit Iceland someday and was not aware of the danders there so i look forward to following your blog to find more information.
ReplyDelete